![]() Antenatal visits and adverse perinatal outcomes: results from a British population-based study. Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women: a randomized controlled trial. McDuffie RS Jr, Beck A, Bischoff K, Cross J, Orleans M. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Ickovics JR, Kershaw TS, Westdahl C, Magriples U, Massey Z, Reynolds H et al. Effectiveness of group medical visits for improving diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The effect of health coverage for uninsured pregnant women on maternal health and the use of cesarean section. An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight. The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1995, using different prenatal care indices. Kogan MD, Martin JA, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Ventura SJ, Frigoletto FD. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2014 63 (5): 1–6.Īmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. International comparisons of infant mortality and related factors: United States and Europe, 2010. MacDorman MF, Matthews TJ, Mohangoo AD, Zeitlin J. A comparison of prenatal care use in the United States and Europe. Public Health Rep 2002 116 (4): 306–316.īuekens P, Kotelchuck M, Blondel B, Kristensen FB, Chen JH, Masuy-Stroobant G. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 (10): CD000934.Īmerican Academy of Pediatrics ACoO, Gynecologists. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997 76 (1): 1–14.ĭowswell T, Carroli G, Duley L, Gates S, Gülmezoglu AM, Khan-Neelofur D et al. Philosophy, recent studies, and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal outcomes. Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care I. Caring for our future: a report by the expert panel on the content of prenatal care. Low-risk women with ⩾10 PNV had higher rates of pregnancy interventions without improvement in neonatal outcomes. However, women with>10 PNV were more likely to undergo induction of labor and cesarean delivery. There was no difference in the neonatal composite between the two groups. The primary outcome was a neonatal composite including neonatal intensive-care unit admission, low APGAR score (10 PNV and the remaining 70% ( N=5093) had ⩽10, respectively. ![]() Patients with ⩽10 PNV were compared with those with >10. Exclusion criteria included unknown or third trimester pregnancy dating, pre-existing medical conditions and common pregnancy complications. Study Design:Ī retrospective cohort of 12 092 consecutive, uncomplicated term births was included. We investigated the association between number of prenatal visits (PNV) and pregnancy outcomes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |